<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Access Management New Years resolutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://access.jiscinvolve.org/wp/access-management-new-years-resolutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://access.jiscinvolve.org/wp/access-management-new-years-resolutions/</link>
	<description>federating access management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Powell</title>
		<link>http://access.jiscinvolve.org/wp/access-management-new-years-resolutions/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://access.jiscinvolve.org/access-management-new-years-resolutions/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s slightly late for new year&#039;s resolutions but what I think you meant to write was:

if I were an Institution that uses Shibboleth;
&lt;i&gt;I’d migrate to shib 2&lt;i&gt;
if I were a publisher who has implemented access management using Sibboleth;
&lt;i&gt;I’d migrate to shib 2&lt;/i&gt;
if I were a publisher who has not implemented access management but said they would in 2010;
&lt;i&gt;I’d go ahead and deploy shib or similar&lt;/i&gt;
if I were a member of JISC access management team;
&lt;i&gt;I’d try and remember that pushing for the adoption of SAML and/or other standards, using whatever technology is appropriate for a particular institution, has much more long term value than pushing one particular piece of software (and is much more in line with what other parts of JISC do)&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry to sound like a stuck record :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s slightly late for new year&#8217;s resolutions but what I think you meant to write was:</p>
<p>if I were an Institution that uses Shibboleth;<br />
<i>I’d migrate to shib 2</i><i><br />
if I were a publisher who has implemented access management using Sibboleth;<br />
</i><i>I’d migrate to shib 2</i><br />
if I were a publisher who has not implemented access management but said they would in 2010;<br />
<i>I’d go ahead and deploy shib or similar</i><br />
if I were a member of JISC access management team;<br />
<i>I’d try and remember that pushing for the adoption of SAML and/or other standards, using whatever technology is appropriate for a particular institution, has much more long term value than pushing one particular piece of software (and is much more in line with what other parts of JISC do)</i></p>
<p>Sorry to sound like a stuck record <img src='http://access.jiscinvolve.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

